Lectrix -> RE: INJUSTICE! (In other words, Mercs are Overpowered) (6/2/2011 23:54:57)
|
I posted this a while ago, but I doubt the numbers have changed much. If anything, I think there are now even more Mercs in 2v2. quote:
According to these results (which were provided by H4ll0w33n): quote:
100 battles (not going to write it all out for obvious reasons) BH BH= 9 BH TM= 12 BH Merc=22 TM Merc =21 TM TM= 11 Merc Merc=25 ... and my calculations, I have managed to come up with the following: In 100 2v2 Battles, you end up fighting 2 opponents per Battle, for a total of 200 opponents. So we double each of those numbers. Mercs: 22 + 21 +25 + 25 (I added 25 twice, because there were 2 Mercs in the 25 "Merc Merc" Battles) = 93 Bounty Hunters: 12+ 22+ 9 + 9 = 52 Tech Mages: 12 + 21 + 11 + 11 = 55 Mercs: 93/200 = 0.465 Bounty Hunters: 52/200 = 0.26 Tech Mages: 55/200 = 0.275 Which means that, out of 100 2v2 Battles, 46.5% of the Duelists were Mercs. Mercs account for about 46.5% of all high-leveled 2v2 Players. The percentage can vary of course, but 46.5% should be pretty accurate. Now, if you look at it the other way, 53.5% of all high-leveled 2v2 Players are NOT Mercs (26% are Bounty Hunters, 27.5% are Tech Mages). So 1 out of 3 Classes make up almost 50% of high-leveled 2v2 Players. Why are there so many Mercs in 2v2?!? Why is it that a single Class dominates the entire 2v2 Battle Mode?!? This is obviously not what I would call "Balance". Balance is "a state of equilibrium", and last time I checked, 46.5 doesn't come close to equalling 26 or 27.5. quote:
The time for lies is over. Every Player KNOWS the truth: 2v2 Mercs are Overpowered. There is an overwhelming number of Mercs in 2v2. Numbers don't lie. If Mercs prefer to get a few more wins at the cost of Balance, then they're just being selfish. I'm disgusted at the lack of Balance in 2v2, and I'm sure every non-Merc feels the same way. This needs to end, NOW.
|
|
|
|