Hun Kingq -> RE: =ED= May 1st Design Notes (5/5/2012 2:12:45)
|
Mdmarvel, take a look at those players inventory they have very little thus not supporting the game anymore so why reward the players that don't support the game anymore and punish the ones that do. If they were playing from the start, why are they still Level 31 I even seen a Level 26 with all Beta weapons.Since the Alpha and Beta Weapons are "legacy items" before the era of enhancements then they should have got no enhancements, make them non sell-able collector items. If those players do not support the game financially anymore why reward them and punish the ones that do with weapon requirements? rej, nothing I write is "completely irrelevant to the rest of your post, and it is hypocritical to a fault" because they are always talking about making things fair and balance. With the new Armor how is it fair and balanced for a merc with max hybrid armor to have +11 or +12, depending on health, defense and resistance with the new armor where the ones without the passive could only have +5 or + 6, depending on the health, defense and resistance. Same thing with the Cyber hunter and tact merc. If they talk about making things fair and balance then do so and if you are an ethical player you would want the same no matter what class you are. The ND Mallet Guy, putting requirements on those weapons will not take away the damage potential but will take away the stat abuse potential so it would not be nerfing the weapon. Those players equip those weapons to give the skills more power to the stat they abuse not for the damage and everyone wants to curtail stat abusing but they want to allow players to go around with weapons without requirements. khalidon5000, I know what she means, so the gamma bot is an "legacy item" should that get a buff? Any item that will not be offered anymore will become "legacy items," will they get a buff, no requirements, and 10 enhancement slots or if they have 10, then should they get 15 or 20 enhancement slots?
|
|
|
|