Hopeful Guy -> RE: =DF= SoulWeaver (All versions) Discussion Thread (8/2/2014 17:11:32)
|
Sflamin: In response to the point about Necro, as I understand it (and I could be wrong), the tier system is somewhat like this, with a decrease in width of tier corresponding to a decrease in number of classes in the said tier. The classes fit along the spectrum illustrated at the bottom within their tiers, and also follow the power level increase, not just from tier to tier but within their respective tiers. For example, DeathKnight (after it is brought in line) would probably be somewhere at the bottom middle-left of T3, which would translate into it being 'a class which is on the weaker side of Tier 3 and leans towards being more offensive than defensive. By contrast, Kathool Adept would be top far-left, or 'one of the stronger T3 classes and is extremely offensively-minded', enTropy would be top middle-right (although it has ridiculously good defence, it can hit very hard with Womb- Being- Touch) and Pyro top far-right (can survive anything, no burst damage, relies on DoTs). Necro slots in at the top right of T2, so it is a powerful class that is more defensively oriented. That makes it better than, say, Kathool Adept, at fighting anything with 20k+ HP, because KAA runs out of MP far too quickly and hasn't got much of a defence. SW is not quite at the top, but near there, and far-left, and MSW is bottom-left of T3, so can deal more burst damage than DL or Pyro (middle of T3, far-right, and top-right corner respectively) but in terms of overall play is still worse than both. Is this correct, Ash? EDIT: TES: Ascendant is meant to be more powerful in general than MSW, right? So if they both do 'glass cannon' Ascendant has to do it better than MSW. (Also, you missed the fact that against our hypothetical enemy with 0 resistances and 0 defences, it is best to use a fire weapon for Ascendant, and the 40% is added, not multiplied, on Final. Factoring them in, Ascendant actually does 1.5(1.3((130*1.05)+(1.1*130)+1.25((237.5*1.15)+(265*2/1.5)))= 2072%, a bit more than in your calculations.
|
|
|
|