Fleur Du Mal
Member
|
Hi there! Your post in the "What do your works really mean"-thread made me to go and read your poetry a few days ago. I ended up reading the whole first page. You have good vocabulary and are skilled with rhymes, imo. There's a strong message in the majority of your poems. Because I'm biased towards being anti-war, I can't really tell if the message is too underlined or not. I don't think it is, but as I said, that might be caused by the fact that I don't disagree with the message. My favourite poem from the first read is Crusade. I also found your lyrics very interesting and enjoyable. Now to some critique that, admittedly, is more a matter of opinions and preferences. I'm not a fan of using many exclamation marks in poetry. Using one or two in the points to be highlighted is surely fine, but when I start to see them every second or third line, I wonder whether they run over all other nuances in the piece. So, for example, that's what happened with your poem If I Weren't Blind, Angel -- which I otherwise enjoyed tremendously. But do you really need them all? Yet, having asked that, I understand that this is my opinion only. Another point that came to my mind is a minor detail in Crusade. You occasionally start lines with 'And', like here: quote:
Though we fight for glory, All we find is gore. Our leaders call on us, And they ask for more. Per se, there's nothing wrong with that, but sometimes, they feel a sort of waste of space. Little bridging words that connect sentences but that sometimes steal room from stronger words and, hence, stronger imagery. For example here, you could have the last line go: 'Always asking for more' or something even better that could bring that line more impact that 'And they' brings. These were the few comments that came up to my mind while reading. And now that I've found my way here, there's a risk that I shall return and end up dissecting something. Sorry for that in beforehand =P
|