Remorse
Member
|
@ xendran, Honestly in some things that slip through no testing was needed to determine it is unbalanced or cause further issues, yet they implement it. Like all the luck based skill cores out currently. Yes you can test to see if they are overpowered or not in battles but Im not sure if they considered the fact that players complain about luck enough as it is!! Im happy with normal luck (blocks, deflects, crits.) but I dont like the fact that skill cores like Massive strike, frostbite, pyro fly, steel thorns, and the Halloween pumpkin just worsen luck determination in battle. Perhaps the problem is the ideas being tested in the first place, I cant say its the testers fault when they are asked to test something most player would disagree to begin with. Because if the ideas for skill cores were more like those of xendrans list then the testers could test something players agree with to start with. Im not sure if its the case already but if not then I think it is the testers that should come up with the ideas to test if they are balance battle related, rather then, no offense to the devs, them coming up with the ideas even though they lack in battle experience. Though I do agree that they need more testing help, and perhaps rather then just the testers role being test, but also come up with the ideas which are more battle balanced related (such as skill cores) to begin with.
< Message edited by Remorse -- 1/19/2013 6:22:42 >
|